Examining IPv6 Performance
Performance is sometimes used as a reason not to deploy IPv6. Here’s the results of large scale measurement of IPv4 and IPv6 performance – you be the judge.
Performance is sometimes used as a reason not to deploy IPv6. Here’s the results of large scale measurement of IPv4 and IPv6 performance – you be the judge.
Geoff Huston shares his observations of some of the presentations at NANOG 65, held recently in Montreal, Canada.
A collation of the presentations I found most stimulating at the DNS Operations, Analysis and Research Centre’s Fall 2015 workshop.
Today’s Internet is not truly an “open” Internet. It could be, but to get there it’s not just going to happen by itself.
It’s easy to make predictions; the tough part is getting them right! I’ve applied two different models to IPv4 exhaustion for a more detailed prediction.
An in-depth review of where APNIC is up to with its remaining pools of IPv4 addresses.
Last month I scored Apple 7/10 for IPv6 efforts. In light of recent changes, what’s their score now?
How are we going with IPv6? When can we contemplate throwing away IPv4? APNIC’s Chief Scientist, Geoff Huston, explores the state of IPv6, in light of the impending exhaustion of ARIN’s available IPv4 address pool.
There were some positive IPv6 announcements at Apple’s WWDC, but I’m afraid I can’t mark these initiatives down as a 10/10 success.
My impressions of some of the more interesting NANOG 64 sessions that grabbed my attention.